Which factor is NOT used to determine the percentage split when multiple agencies participate in a seizure?

• A. Written agreement between agencies
• B. Population of jurisdiction
• C. Rank of seizing officer
• D. Date of seizure

Answer: (D)

When multiple agencies are involved in a seizure, how the proceeds are divided is driven by preexisting rules or objective criteria that reflect each agency’s involvement, rather than simple timing. A written agreement between agencies often codifies the shares each agency receives, providing a clear, negotiated framework for distributing assets. If there isn’t a standing MOA, some distributions may mirror proportional factors like the population of the jurisdiction or the relative resources and manpower contributed to the case, which helps ensure a fair reflection of each agency’s burden and stake. The rank of the seizing officer can influence lead credit or which agency is recognized as primary in a given action, and that can affect how shares are allocated under some agreements. The date of seizure, however, doesn’t inform the division formula; it’s not a factor used to determine how proceeds are split.